Australia vs ECA: Non-oil Ldcs (unsdcode:98120): Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate)

Australia
0.0%
in 2018
ECA: Non-oil Ldcs (unsdcode:98120)
0.2%
in 2019
Australia rank
103rd
ECA: Non-oil Ldcs (unsdcode:98120) rank
100th

Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) over time

  • Australia
  • ECA: Non-oil Ldcs (unsdcode:98120)
0.050.10.150.20.25199620072019

How they compare

ECA: Non-oil Ldcs (unsdcode:98120) currently reports 0.2% against 0.0% in Australia, a difference of 0.2%.

That makes ECA: Non-oil Ldcs (unsdcode:98120)'s figure about 4.5 times Australia's.

Across all 5 years both countries report, ECA: Non-oil Ldcs (unsdcode:98120) has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 103rd and ECA: Non-oil Ldcs (unsdcode:98120) ranks 100th of 178 countries.

ECA: Non-oil Ldcs (unsdcode:98120) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia ECA: Non-oil Ldcs (unsdcode:98120) Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% ECA: Non-oil Ldcs (unsdcode:98120)
2010s 0.0% 0.2% 0.2% ECA: Non-oil Ldcs (unsdcode:98120)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outbound mobility ratio to east asia, both sexes (uis estimate), Australia or ECA: Non-oil Ldcs (unsdcode:98120)?
ECA: Non-oil Ldcs (unsdcode:98120), at 0.2% against 0.0% in Australia as of 2019.
What is the difference in outbound mobility ratio to east asia, both sexes (uis estimate) between Australia and ECA: Non-oil Ldcs (unsdcode:98120)?
0.2%, with ECA: Non-oil Ldcs (unsdcode:98120) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and ECA: Non-oil Ldcs (unsdcode:98120)?
5 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2018.
How do Australia and ECA: Non-oil Ldcs (unsdcode:98120) rank globally for outbound mobility ratio to east asia, both sexes (uis estimate)?
Australia ranks 103rd and ECA: Non-oil Ldcs (unsdcode:98120) ranks 100th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs ECA: Non-oil Ldcs (unsdcode:98120): Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate). Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-east-asia-both-sexes-uis-estimate-percent/australia/eca-non-oil-ldcs-unsdcode-98120/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-east-asia-both-sexes-uis-estimate-percent/australia/eca-non-oil-ldcs-unsdcode-98120/">Australia vs ECA: Non-oil Ldcs (unsdcode:98120): Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
396 places, 8,063 data points, 1996–2023
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release