New Zealand vs SDG: Sub-saharan Africa: Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate)
New Zealand
0.1%
in 2018
SDG: Sub-saharan Africa
0.2%
in 2019
New Zealand rank
82nd
SDG: Sub-saharan Africa rank
82nd
Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) over time
- New Zealand
- SDG: Sub-saharan Africa
How they compare
SDG: Sub-saharan Africa currently reports 0.2% against 0.1% in New Zealand, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes SDG: Sub-saharan Africa's figure about 3.0 times New Zealand's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, SDG: Sub-saharan Africa has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 82nd and SDG: Sub-saharan Africa ranks 82nd of 178 countries.
SDG: Sub-saharan Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outbound mobility ratio to east asia, both sexes (uis estimate), New Zealand or SDG: Sub-saharan Africa?
- SDG: Sub-saharan Africa, at 0.2% against 0.1% in New Zealand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in outbound mobility ratio to east asia, both sexes (uis estimate) between New Zealand and SDG: Sub-saharan Africa?
- 0.1%, with SDG: Sub-saharan Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and SDG: Sub-saharan Africa?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2018.
- How do New Zealand and SDG: Sub-saharan Africa rank globally for outbound mobility ratio to east asia, both sexes (uis estimate)?
- New Zealand ranks 82nd and SDG: Sub-saharan Africa ranks 82nd of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release