ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) vs Zimbabwe: Outbound mobility ratio to Latin America, both sexes (UIS estimate)
ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108)
0.1%
in 2020
Zimbabwe
0.0%
in 2015
ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) rank
84th
Zimbabwe rank
83rd
Outbound mobility ratio to Latin America, both sexes (UIS estimate) over time
- ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108)
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) currently reports 0.1% against 0.0% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108)'s figure about 3.1 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) ranks 84th and Zimbabwe ranks 83rd of 218 groups.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outbound mobility ratio to latin america, both sexes (uis estimate), ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) or Zimbabwe?
- ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108), at 0.1% against 0.0% in Zimbabwe as of 2020.
- What is the difference in outbound mobility ratio to latin america, both sexes (uis estimate) between ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) and Zimbabwe?
- 0.1%, with ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) and Zimbabwe?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2015.
- How do ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) and Zimbabwe rank globally for outbound mobility ratio to latin america, both sexes (uis estimate)?
- ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) ranks 84th and Zimbabwe ranks 83rd of 218 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Outbound mobility ratio to Latin America, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release