China vs ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407): Outbound mobility ratio to South and West Asia, adjusted gender

China
0.7601 GPIA
in 2023
ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407)
0.7743 GPIA
in 2023
China rank
54th
ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407) rank
57th

Outbound mobility ratio to South and West Asia, adjusted gender over time

  • China
  • ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407)
00.20.40.60.8201120172023

How they compare

ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407) currently reports 0.7743 GPIA against 0.7601 GPIA in China, a difference of 0.0142 GPIA.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407) ahead.

China ranks 54th and ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407) ranks 57th of 116 countries.

ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407) Difference Ahead
2010s 0.5201 GPIA 0.7853 GPIA 0.2652 GPIA ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407)
2020s 0.7321 GPIA 0.7633 GPIA 0.0312 GPIA ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outbound mobility ratio to south and west asia, adjusted gender, China or ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407)?
ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407), at 0.7743 GPIA against 0.7601 GPIA in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in outbound mobility ratio to south and west asia, adjusted gender between China and ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407)?
0.0142 GPIA, with ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407)?
12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do China and ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407) rank globally for outbound mobility ratio to south and west asia, adjusted gender?
China ranks 54th and ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407) ranks 57th of 116 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Outbound mobility ratio to South and West Asia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407): Outbound mobility ratio to South and West Asia, adjusted gender. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-south-and-west-asia-adjusted-gender-parity-index-gpia/china/escap-eco-eco-unsdcode-98407/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-south-and-west-asia-adjusted-gender-parity-index-gpia/china/escap-eco-eco-unsdcode-98407/">China vs ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407): Outbound mobility ratio to South and West Asia, adjusted gender</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Outbound mobility ratio to South and West Asia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)
Unit
GPIA
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
333 places, 3,832 data points, 2011–2023
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release