ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) vs Hong Kong, China: Outbound mobility ratio to South and West Asia, both sexes (UIS)

ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108)
0.1%
in 2020
Hong Kong, China
0.0%
in 2023
ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) rank
84th
Hong Kong, China rank
85th

Outbound mobility ratio to South and West Asia, both sexes (UIS) over time

  • ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108)
  • Hong Kong, China
00.020.040.060.08199820102023

How they compare

ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) currently reports 0.1% against 0.0% in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.1%.

That makes ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108)'s figure about 10.6 times Hong Kong, China's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) ranks 84th and Hong Kong, China ranks 85th of 218 groups.

ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108)
2010s 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108)
2020s 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outbound mobility ratio to south and west asia, both sexes (uis), ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) or Hong Kong, China?
ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108), at 0.1% against 0.0% in Hong Kong, China as of 2020.
What is the difference in outbound mobility ratio to south and west asia, both sexes (uis) between ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) and Hong Kong, China?
0.1%, with ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) and Hong Kong, China?
18 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2020.
How do ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) and Hong Kong, China rank globally for outbound mobility ratio to south and west asia, both sexes (uis)?
ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) ranks 84th and Hong Kong, China ranks 85th of 218 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Outbound mobility ratio to South and West Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) vs Hong Kong, China: Outbound mobility ratio to South and West Asia, both sexes (UIS). Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-south-and-west-asia-both-sexes-uis-estimate-percent/eca-ecowas-unsdcode-98108/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-south-and-west-asia-both-sexes-uis-estimate-percent/eca-ecowas-unsdcode-98108/hong-kong-sar-china/">ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) vs Hong Kong, China: Outbound mobility ratio to South and West Asia, both sexes (UIS)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Outbound mobility ratio to South and West Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
421 places, 9,249 data points, 1997–2023
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release