Rwanda vs WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations: Outbound mobility ratio to South and West Asia, both sexes (UIS)

Rwanda
0.2%
in 2023
WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations
0.3%
in 2019
Rwanda rank
28th
WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations rank
27th

Outbound mobility ratio to South and West Asia, both sexes (UIS) over time

  • Rwanda
  • WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations
0123199820102023

How they compare

WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations currently reports 0.3% against 0.2% in Rwanda, a difference of 0.1%.

That makes WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations's figure about 1.6 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Rwanda ahead.

Rwanda ranks 28th and WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations ranks 27th of 203 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations Difference Ahead
1990s 3.4% 0.1% 3.3% Rwanda
2000s 0.6% 0.0% 0.5% Rwanda
2010s 0.7% 0.2% 0.5% Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outbound mobility ratio to south and west asia, both sexes (uis), Rwanda or WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations?
WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations, at 0.3% against 0.2% in Rwanda as of 2019.
What is the difference in outbound mobility ratio to south and west asia, both sexes (uis) between Rwanda and WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations?
0.1%, with WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations?
21 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2019.
How do Rwanda and WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations rank globally for outbound mobility ratio to south and west asia, both sexes (uis)?
Rwanda ranks 28th and WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations ranks 27th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Outbound mobility ratio to South and West Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations: Outbound mobility ratio to South and West Asia, both sexes (UIS). Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-south-and-west-asia-both-sexes-uis-estimate-percent/rwanda/wb-fragile-and-conflict-affected-situations/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-south-and-west-asia-both-sexes-uis-estimate-percent/rwanda/wb-fragile-and-conflict-affected-situations/">Rwanda vs WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations: Outbound mobility ratio to South and West Asia, both sexes (UIS)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Outbound mobility ratio to South and West Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
421 places, 9,249 data points, 1997–2023
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release