AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific vs Macau, China: Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, adjusted gender parity

AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific
0.8552 GPIA
in 2023
Macau, China
0.3674 GPIA
in 2023
AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific rank
95th
Macau, China rank
96th

Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, adjusted gender parity over time

  • AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific
  • Macau, China
00.511.52201120172023

How they compare

AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific currently reports 0.8552 GPIA against 0.3674 GPIA in Macau, China, a difference of 0.4878 GPIA.

That makes AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific's figure about 2.3 times Macau, China's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific ahead.

AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific ranks 95th and Macau, China ranks 96th of 217 groups.

Across the 2 decades both report, AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific averaged higher in 1 and Macau, China in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific Macau, China Difference Ahead
2010s 0.856 GPIA 0.9254 GPIA 0.0694 GPIA Macau, China
2020s 0.8292 GPIA 0.43 GPIA 0.3992 GPIA AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outbound mobility ratio to sub-saharan africa, adjusted gender parity, AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific or Macau, China?
AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific, at 0.8552 GPIA against 0.3674 GPIA in Macau, China as of 2023.
What is the difference in outbound mobility ratio to sub-saharan africa, adjusted gender parity between AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific and Macau, China?
0.4878 GPIA, with AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific and Macau, China?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
How do AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific and Macau, China rank globally for outbound mobility ratio to sub-saharan africa, adjusted gender parity?
AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific ranks 95th and Macau, China ranks 96th of 217 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific vs Macau, China: Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, adjusted gender parity. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-sub-saharan-africa-adjusted-gender-parity-index-gpia/aims-east-asia-and-the-pacific/macao-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-sub-saharan-africa-adjusted-gender-parity-index-gpia/aims-east-asia-and-the-pacific/macao-sar-china/">AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific vs Macau, China: Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, adjusted gender parity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)
Unit
GPIA
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
336 places, 3,848 data points, 2011–2023
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release