China vs ESCAP: South and South-west Asia (sswa) (unsdcode:98420): Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, adjusted gender parity

China
0.9878 GPIA
in 2023
ESCAP: South and South-west Asia (sswa) (unsdcode:98420)
0.9283 GPIA
in 2023
China rank
45th
ESCAP: South and South-west Asia (sswa) (unsdcode:98420) rank
46th

Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, adjusted gender parity over time

  • China
  • ESCAP: South and South-west Asia (sswa) (unsdcode:98420)
00.20.40.60.81201120172023

How they compare

China currently reports 0.9878 GPIA against 0.9283 GPIA in ESCAP: South and South-west Asia (sswa) (unsdcode:98420), a difference of 0.0595 GPIA.

That makes China's figure about 1.1 times ESCAP: South and South-west Asia (sswa) (unsdcode:98420)'s.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was China ahead.

China ranks 45th and ESCAP: South and South-west Asia (sswa) (unsdcode:98420) ranks 46th of 119 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China ESCAP: South and South-west Asia (sswa) (unsdcode:98420) Difference Ahead
2010s 0.8485 GPIA 0.7814 GPIA 0.0671 GPIA China
2020s 0.9563 GPIA 0.9109 GPIA 0.0453 GPIA China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outbound mobility ratio to sub-saharan africa, adjusted gender parity, China or ESCAP: South and South-west Asia (sswa) (unsdcode:98420)?
China, at 0.9878 GPIA against 0.9283 GPIA in ESCAP: South and South-west Asia (sswa) (unsdcode:98420) as of 2023.
What is the difference in outbound mobility ratio to sub-saharan africa, adjusted gender parity between China and ESCAP: South and South-west Asia (sswa) (unsdcode:98420)?
0.0595 GPIA, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and ESCAP: South and South-west Asia (sswa) (unsdcode:98420)?
12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do China and ESCAP: South and South-west Asia (sswa) (unsdcode:98420) rank globally for outbound mobility ratio to sub-saharan africa, adjusted gender parity?
China ranks 45th and ESCAP: South and South-west Asia (sswa) (unsdcode:98420) ranks 46th of 119 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs ESCAP: South and South-west Asia (sswa) (unsdcode:98420): Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, adjusted gender parity. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-sub-saharan-africa-adjusted-gender-parity-index-gpia/china/escap-south-and-south-west-asia-sswa-unsdcode-98420/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-sub-saharan-africa-adjusted-gender-parity-index-gpia/china/escap-south-and-south-west-asia-sswa-unsdcode-98420/">China vs ESCAP: South and South-west Asia (sswa) (unsdcode:98420): Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, adjusted gender parity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)
Unit
GPIA
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
336 places, 3,848 data points, 2011–2023
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release