China vs UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa: Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, adjusted gender parity

China
0.9878 GPIA
in 2023
UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa
0.9343 GPIA
in 2023
China rank
45th
UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa rank
43rd

Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, adjusted gender parity over time

  • China
  • UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa
00.20.40.60.81201120172023

How they compare

China currently reports 0.9878 GPIA against 0.9343 GPIA in UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa, a difference of 0.0535 GPIA.

That makes China's figure about 1.1 times UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa ahead.

China ranks 45th and UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa ranks 43rd of 119 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa Difference Ahead
2010s 0.8485 GPIA 0.8538 GPIA 0.0053 GPIA UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa
2020s 0.9563 GPIA 0.8949 GPIA 0.0614 GPIA China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outbound mobility ratio to sub-saharan africa, adjusted gender parity, China or UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa?
China, at 0.9878 GPIA against 0.9343 GPIA in UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in outbound mobility ratio to sub-saharan africa, adjusted gender parity between China and UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa?
0.0535 GPIA, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa?
12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do China and UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa rank globally for outbound mobility ratio to sub-saharan africa, adjusted gender parity?
China ranks 45th and UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa ranks 43rd of 119 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa: Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, adjusted gender parity. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-sub-saharan-africa-adjusted-gender-parity-index-gpia/china/unicef-eastern-and-southern-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-sub-saharan-africa-adjusted-gender-parity-index-gpia/china/unicef-eastern-and-southern-africa/">China vs UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa: Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, adjusted gender parity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)
Unit
GPIA
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
336 places, 3,848 data points, 2011–2023
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release