Angola vs WB: Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (hipc): Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, both sexes (UIS)

Angola
0.4%
in 2023
WB: Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (hipc)
1.0%
in 2021
Angola rank
29th
WB: Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (hipc) rank
30th

Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, both sexes (UIS) over time

  • Angola
  • WB: Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (hipc)
0102030199720102023

How they compare

WB: Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (hipc) currently reports 1.0% against 0.4% in Angola, a difference of 0.6%.

That makes WB: Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (hipc)'s figure about 2.3 times Angola's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Angola has been ahead every year.

Angola ranks 29th and WB: Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (hipc) ranks 30th of 186 countries.

Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola WB: Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (hipc) Difference Ahead
1990s 30.2% 3.2% 27.0% Angola
2010s 1.8% 1.0% 0.8% Angola

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outbound mobility ratio to sub-saharan africa, both sexes (uis), Angola or WB: Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (hipc)?
WB: Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (hipc), at 1.0% against 0.4% in Angola as of 2021.
What is the difference in outbound mobility ratio to sub-saharan africa, both sexes (uis) between Angola and WB: Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (hipc)?
0.6%, with WB: Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (hipc) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and WB: Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (hipc)?
6 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2016.
How do Angola and WB: Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (hipc) rank globally for outbound mobility ratio to sub-saharan africa, both sexes (uis)?
Angola ranks 29th and WB: Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (hipc) ranks 30th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs WB: Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (hipc): Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, both sexes (UIS). Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-sub-saharan-africa-both-sexes-uis-estimate-percent/angola/wb-heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-sub-saharan-africa-both-sexes-uis-estimate-percent/angola/wb-heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/">Angola vs WB: Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (hipc): Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, both sexes (UIS)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
404 places, 8,361 data points, 1996–2023
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release