ECA: Eca: Oil Ldcs (unsdcode:98122) vs Zimbabwe: Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, both sexes (UIS)
ECA: Eca: Oil Ldcs (unsdcode:98122)
1.7%
in 2021
Zimbabwe
9.1%
in 2015
ECA: Eca: Oil Ldcs (unsdcode:98122) rank
8th
Zimbabwe rank
8th
Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, both sexes (UIS) over time
- ECA: Eca: Oil Ldcs (unsdcode:98122)
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 9.1% against 1.7% in ECA: Eca: Oil Ldcs (unsdcode:98122), a difference of 7.4%.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 5.4 times ECA: Eca: Oil Ldcs (unsdcode:98122)'s.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
ECA: Eca: Oil Ldcs (unsdcode:98122) ranks 8th and Zimbabwe ranks 8th of 218 groups.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outbound mobility ratio to sub-saharan africa, both sexes (uis), ECA: Eca: Oil Ldcs (unsdcode:98122) or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 9.1% against 1.7% in ECA: Eca: Oil Ldcs (unsdcode:98122) as of 2015.
- What is the difference in outbound mobility ratio to sub-saharan africa, both sexes (uis) between ECA: Eca: Oil Ldcs (unsdcode:98122) and Zimbabwe?
- 7.4%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for ECA: Eca: Oil Ldcs (unsdcode:98122) and Zimbabwe?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2015.
- How do ECA: Eca: Oil Ldcs (unsdcode:98122) and Zimbabwe rank globally for outbound mobility ratio to sub-saharan africa, both sexes (uis)?
- ECA: Eca: Oil Ldcs (unsdcode:98122) ranks 8th and Zimbabwe ranks 8th of 218 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release