ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116) vs Zimbabwe: Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, both sexes (UIS)
ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116)
2.2%
in 2016
Zimbabwe
9.1%
in 2015
ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116) rank
7th
Zimbabwe rank
8th
Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, both sexes (UIS) over time
- ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116)
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 9.1% against 2.2% in ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116), a difference of 6.9%.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 4.1 times ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116)'s.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116) ranks 7th and Zimbabwe ranks 8th of 218 groups.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outbound mobility ratio to sub-saharan africa, both sexes (uis), ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116) or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 9.1% against 2.2% in ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116) as of 2015.
- What is the difference in outbound mobility ratio to sub-saharan africa, both sexes (uis) between ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116) and Zimbabwe?
- 6.9%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116) and Zimbabwe?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2015.
- How do ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116) and Zimbabwe rank globally for outbound mobility ratio to sub-saharan africa, both sexes (uis)?
- ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116) ranks 7th and Zimbabwe ranks 8th of 218 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release