ECA: Land-locked Ldcs (unsdcode:98117) vs Sao Tome and Principe: Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, both sexes (UIS)

ECA: Land-locked Ldcs (unsdcode:98117)
1.5%
in 2015
Sao Tome and Principe
2.2%
in 2015
ECA: Land-locked Ldcs (unsdcode:98117) rank
11th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
13th

Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, both sexes (UIS) over time

  • ECA: Land-locked Ldcs (unsdcode:98117)
  • Sao Tome and Principe
051015199720062015

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 2.2% against 1.5% in ECA: Land-locked Ldcs (unsdcode:98117), a difference of 0.7%.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.5 times ECA: Land-locked Ldcs (unsdcode:98117)'s.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.

ECA: Land-locked Ldcs (unsdcode:98117) ranks 11th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 13th of 218 groups.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade ECA: Land-locked Ldcs (unsdcode:98117) Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
2000s 2.5% 15.6% 13.1% Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 1.7% 6.4% 4.6% Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outbound mobility ratio to sub-saharan africa, both sexes (uis), ECA: Land-locked Ldcs (unsdcode:98117) or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 2.2% against 1.5% in ECA: Land-locked Ldcs (unsdcode:98117) as of 2015.
What is the difference in outbound mobility ratio to sub-saharan africa, both sexes (uis) between ECA: Land-locked Ldcs (unsdcode:98117) and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.7%, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for ECA: Land-locked Ldcs (unsdcode:98117) and Sao Tome and Principe?
5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2015.
How do ECA: Land-locked Ldcs (unsdcode:98117) and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for outbound mobility ratio to sub-saharan africa, both sexes (uis)?
ECA: Land-locked Ldcs (unsdcode:98117) ranks 11th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 13th of 218 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

ECA: Land-locked Ldcs (unsdcode:98117) vs Sao Tome and Principe: Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, both sexes (UIS). Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-sub-saharan-africa-both-sexes-uis-estimate-percent/eca-land-locked-ldcs-unsdcode-98117/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-sub-saharan-africa-both-sexes-uis-estimate-percent/eca-land-locked-ldcs-unsdcode-98117/sao-tome-and-principe/">ECA: Land-locked Ldcs (unsdcode:98117) vs Sao Tome and Principe: Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, both sexes (UIS)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
404 places, 8,361 data points, 1996–2023
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release