British Virgin Islands vs ECA: Eac (unsdcode:98114): Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, female (UIS estimate)

British Virgin Islands
0.3%
in 2023
ECA: Eac (unsdcode:98114)
0.9%
in 2021
British Virgin Islands rank
19th
ECA: Eac (unsdcode:98114) rank
22nd

Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, female (UIS estimate) over time

  • British Virgin Islands
  • ECA: Eac (unsdcode:98114)
00.20.40.60.81201120172023

How they compare

ECA: Eac (unsdcode:98114) currently reports 0.9% against 0.3% in British Virgin Islands, a difference of 0.6%.

That makes ECA: Eac (unsdcode:98114)'s figure about 3.6 times British Virgin Islands's.

Across all 10 years both countries report, ECA: Eac (unsdcode:98114) has been ahead every year.

British Virgin Islands ranks 19th and ECA: Eac (unsdcode:98114) ranks 22nd of 165 countries.

ECA: Eac (unsdcode:98114) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade British Virgin Islands ECA: Eac (unsdcode:98114) Difference Ahead
2010s 0.0% 0.8% 0.8% ECA: Eac (unsdcode:98114)
2020s 0.1% 0.9% 0.8% ECA: Eac (unsdcode:98114)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outbound mobility ratio to sub-saharan africa, female (uis estimate), British Virgin Islands or ECA: Eac (unsdcode:98114)?
ECA: Eac (unsdcode:98114), at 0.9% against 0.3% in British Virgin Islands as of 2021.
What is the difference in outbound mobility ratio to sub-saharan africa, female (uis estimate) between British Virgin Islands and ECA: Eac (unsdcode:98114)?
0.6%, with ECA: Eac (unsdcode:98114) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for British Virgin Islands and ECA: Eac (unsdcode:98114)?
10 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2021.
How do British Virgin Islands and ECA: Eac (unsdcode:98114) rank globally for outbound mobility ratio to sub-saharan africa, female (uis estimate)?
British Virgin Islands ranks 19th and ECA: Eac (unsdcode:98114) ranks 22nd of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, female (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

British Virgin Islands vs ECA: Eac (unsdcode:98114): Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, female (UIS estimate). Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-sub-saharan-africa-female-uis-estimate-percent/british-virgin-islands/eca-eac-unsdcode-98114/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-sub-saharan-africa-female-uis-estimate-percent/british-virgin-islands/eca-eac-unsdcode-98114/">British Virgin Islands vs ECA: Eac (unsdcode:98114): Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, female (UIS estimate)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, female (UIS estimate) (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
382 places, 4,417 data points, 2011–2023
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release