Statizoid

China vs ESCWA: Arab Countries In-conflict (unsdcode:98506): Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, female (UIS estimate)

China
0.0%
in 2023
ESCWA: Arab Countries In-conflict (unsdcode:98506)
0.0%
in 2016
China rank
95th
ESCWA: Arab Countries In-conflict (unsdcode:98506) rank
95th

Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, female (UIS estimate) over time

  • China
  • ESCWA: Arab Countries In-conflict (unsdcode:98506)
00.010.020.03201120172023

How they compare

ESCWA: Arab Countries In-conflict (unsdcode:98506) currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in China, a difference of 0.0%.

That makes ESCWA: Arab Countries In-conflict (unsdcode:98506)'s figure about 68.0 times China's.

Across all 5 years both countries report, ESCWA: Arab Countries In-conflict (unsdcode:98506) has been ahead every year.

China ranks 95th and ESCWA: Arab Countries In-conflict (unsdcode:98506) ranks 95th of 165 countries.

ESCWA: Arab Countries In-conflict (unsdcode:98506) has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outbound mobility ratio to sub-saharan africa, female (uis estimate), China or ESCWA: Arab Countries In-conflict (unsdcode:98506)?
ESCWA: Arab Countries In-conflict (unsdcode:98506), at 0.0% against 0.0% in China as of 2016.
What is the difference in outbound mobility ratio to sub-saharan africa, female (uis estimate) between China and ESCWA: Arab Countries In-conflict (unsdcode:98506)?
0.0%, with ESCWA: Arab Countries In-conflict (unsdcode:98506) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and ESCWA: Arab Countries In-conflict (unsdcode:98506)?
5 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2016.
How do China and ESCWA: Arab Countries In-conflict (unsdcode:98506) rank globally for outbound mobility ratio to sub-saharan africa, female (uis estimate)?
China ranks 95th and ESCWA: Arab Countries In-conflict (unsdcode:98506) ranks 95th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, female (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs ESCWA: Arab Countries In-conflict (unsdcode:98506): Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, female (UIS estimate). Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-sub-saharan-africa-female-uis-estimate-percent/china/escwa-arab-countries-in-conflict-unsdcode-98506/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-sub-saharan-africa-female-uis-estimate-percent/china/escwa-arab-countries-in-conflict-unsdcode-98506/">China vs ESCWA: Arab Countries In-conflict (unsdcode:98506): Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, female (UIS estimate)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, female (UIS estimate) (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
382 places, 4,417 data points, 2011–2023
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release