Macao vs UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa: Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, female (UIS estimate)

Macao
0.0%
in 2023
UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa
0.7%
in 2023
Macao rank
36th
UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa rank
36th

Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, female (UIS estimate) over time

  • Macao
  • UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa
00.250.50.7511.2201120172023

How they compare

UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa currently reports 0.7% against 0.0% in Macao, a difference of 0.7%.

That makes UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa's figure about 48.9 times Macao's.

Across all 12 years both countries report, UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa has been ahead every year.

Macao ranks 36th and UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa ranks 36th of 165 countries.

UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Macao UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa Difference Ahead
2010s 0.0% 1.0% 1.0% UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa
2020s 0.0% 0.7% 0.7% UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outbound mobility ratio to sub-saharan africa, female (uis estimate), Macao or UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa?
UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa, at 0.7% against 0.0% in Macao as of 2023.
What is the difference in outbound mobility ratio to sub-saharan africa, female (uis estimate) between Macao and UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa?
0.7%, with UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Macao and UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa?
12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do Macao and UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa rank globally for outbound mobility ratio to sub-saharan africa, female (uis estimate)?
Macao ranks 36th and UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa ranks 36th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, female (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Macao vs UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa: Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, female (UIS estimate). Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-sub-saharan-africa-female-uis-estimate-percent/macao-sar-china/unicef-eastern-and-southern-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-sub-saharan-africa-female-uis-estimate-percent/macao-sar-china/unicef-eastern-and-southern-africa/">Macao vs UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa: Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, female (UIS estimate)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, female (UIS estimate) (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
382 places, 4,417 data points, 2011–2023
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release