Afghanistan vs WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations: Outbound mobility ratio to the Pacific, both sexes (UIS estimate)

Afghanistan
0.0%
in 2020
WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations
0.1%
in 2019
Afghanistan rank
106th
WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations rank
103rd

Outbound mobility ratio to the Pacific, both sexes (UIS estimate) over time

  • Afghanistan
  • WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations
00.050.10.15199620082020

How they compare

WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations currently reports 0.1% against 0.0% in Afghanistan, a difference of 0.1%.

That makes WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations's figure about 5.6 times Afghanistan's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 8 shared years of data; in 1997 it was WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 106th and WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations ranks 103rd of 194 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 1 and WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations
2000s 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% Afghanistan
2010s 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outbound mobility ratio to the pacific, both sexes (uis estimate), Afghanistan or WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations?
WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations, at 0.1% against 0.0% in Afghanistan as of 2019.
What is the difference in outbound mobility ratio to the pacific, both sexes (uis estimate) between Afghanistan and WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations?
0.1%, with WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations?
8 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2018.
How do Afghanistan and WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations rank globally for outbound mobility ratio to the pacific, both sexes (uis estimate)?
Afghanistan ranks 106th and WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations ranks 103rd of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Outbound mobility ratio to the Pacific, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations: Outbound mobility ratio to the Pacific, both sexes (UIS estimate). Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-the-pacific-both-sexes-uis-estimate-percent/afghanistan/wb-fragile-and-conflict-affected-situations/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-the-pacific-both-sexes-uis-estimate-percent/afghanistan/wb-fragile-and-conflict-affected-situations/">Afghanistan vs WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations: Outbound mobility ratio to the Pacific, both sexes (UIS estimate)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Outbound mobility ratio to the Pacific, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
415 places, 9,680 data points, 1996–2023
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release