What is the difference in outbound mobility ratio to the pacific, female (uis estimate) between ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116) and Rwanda?

0.1%, with ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116) ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116) and Rwanda?

5 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2016.

Where does this data come from?

UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Outbound mobility ratio to the Pacific, female (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116) vs Rwanda: Outbound mobility ratio to the Pacific, female (UIS estimate)

ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116)

0.1%

in 2016

Rwanda

0.0%

in 2023

ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116) rank

93rd

Rwanda rank

93rd

Outbound mobility ratio to the Pacific, female (UIS estimate) over time

ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116)
Rwanda

How they compare

ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116) currently reports 0.1% against 0.0% in Rwanda, a difference of 0.1%.

That makes ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116)'s figure about 10.8 times Rwanda's.

Across all 5 years both countries report, ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116) has been ahead every year.

ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116) ranks 93rd and Rwanda ranks 93rd of 217 groups.

ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116) has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outbound mobility ratio to the pacific, female (uis estimate), ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116) or Rwanda?: ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116), at 0.1% against 0.0% in Rwanda as of 2016.
What is the difference in outbound mobility ratio to the pacific, female (uis estimate) between ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116) and Rwanda?: 0.1%, with ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116) and Rwanda?: 5 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2016.
How do ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116) and Rwanda rank globally for outbound mobility ratio to the pacific, female (uis estimate)?: ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116) ranks 93rd and Rwanda ranks 93rd of 217 groups.
Where does this data come from?: UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Outbound mobility ratio to the Pacific, female (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116) vs Rwanda: Outbound mobility ratio to the Pacific, female (UIS estimate). Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-the-pacific-female-uis-estimate-percent/eca-land-locked-countries-unsdcode-98116/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-the-pacific-female-uis-estimate-percent/eca-land-locked-countries-unsdcode-98116/rwanda/">ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116) vs Rwanda: Outbound mobility ratio to the Pacific, female (UIS estimate)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Outbound mobility ratio to the Pacific, female (UIS estimate) (%)
Unit: %
Source: UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence: CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage: 386 places, 4,461 data points, 2011–2023
Last refreshed: 16 August 2026

February 2026 Data Release