How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and WB: Middle East & North Africa (excluding High Income)?

5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Percentage of qualified teachers in secondary education, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Lithuania vs WB: Middle East & North Africa (excluding High Income): Percentage of qualified teachers in secondary education, female

Lithuania

95.6%

in 2020

WB: Middle East & North Africa (excluding High Income)

92.9%

in 2023

Lithuania rank

53rd

WB: Middle East & North Africa (excluding High Income) rank

56th

Percentage of qualified teachers in secondary education, female over time

Lithuania
WB: Middle East & North Africa (excluding High Income)

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 95.6% against 92.9% in WB: Middle East & North Africa (excluding High Income), a difference of 2.7%.

Across all 5 years both countries report, WB: Middle East & North Africa (excluding High Income) has been ahead every year.

Lithuania ranks 53rd and WB: Middle East & North Africa (excluding High Income) ranks 56th of 93 countries.

WB: Middle East & North Africa (excluding High Income) has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher percentage of qualified teachers in secondary education, female, Lithuania or WB: Middle East & North Africa (excluding High Income)?: Lithuania, at 95.6% against 92.9% in WB: Middle East & North Africa (excluding High Income) as of 2020.
What is the difference in percentage of qualified teachers in secondary education, female between Lithuania and WB: Middle East & North Africa (excluding High Income)?: 2.7%, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and WB: Middle East & North Africa (excluding High Income)?: 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Lithuania and WB: Middle East & North Africa (excluding High Income) rank globally for percentage of qualified teachers in secondary education, female?: Lithuania ranks 53rd and WB: Middle East & North Africa (excluding High Income) ranks 56th of 93 countries.
Where does this data come from?: UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Percentage of qualified teachers in secondary education, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs WB: Middle East & North Africa (excluding High Income): Percentage of qualified teachers in secondary education, female. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/percentage-of-qualified-teachers-in-secondary-education-female-percent-2/lithuania/wb-middle-east-and-north-africa-excluding-high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/percentage-of-qualified-teachers-in-secondary-education-female-percent-2/lithuania/wb-middle-east-and-north-africa-excluding-high-income/">Lithuania vs WB: Middle East & North Africa (excluding High Income): Percentage of qualified teachers in secondary education, female</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Percentage of qualified teachers in secondary education, female (%)
Unit: %
Source: UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence: CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage: 257 places, 2,524 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed: 06 September 2026

February 2026 Data Release