IBRD only vs Mongolia: Percentage of teachers in lower secondary education who are female
Percentage of teachers in lower secondary education who are female over time
- IBRD only
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 74.6% against 58.2% in IBRD only, a difference of 16.4%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.3 times IBRD only's.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
IBRD only ranks 21st and Mongolia ranks 18th of 45 groups.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IBRD only | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 53.1% | 68.5% | 15.5% | Mongolia |
| 2000s | 54.4% | 71.8% | 17.4% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher percentage of teachers in lower secondary education who are female, IBRD only or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 74.6% against 58.2% in IBRD only as of 2007.
- What is the difference in percentage of teachers in lower secondary education who are female between IBRD only and Mongolia?
- 16.4%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and Mongolia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2007.
- How do IBRD only and Mongolia rank globally for percentage of teachers in lower secondary education who are female?
- IBRD only ranks 21st and Mongolia ranks 18th of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Percentage of teachers in lower secondary education who are female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Number of female teachers at the lower secondary level expressed as a percentage of the total number of teachers (male and female) at the lower secondary level in a given school year. Teachers are persons employed full time or part time in an official capacity to guide and direct the learning experience of pupils and students, irrespective of their qualifications or the delivery mechanism, i.e. face-to-face and/or at a distance. This definition excludes educational personnel who have no active teaching duties (e.g. headmasters, headmistresses or principals who do not teach) and persons who work occasionally or in a voluntary capacity in educational institutions.