Iran, Islamic Republic of vs Malta: Persistence to grade 5, male
Iran, Islamic Republic of
96.6%
in 2022
Malta
96.5%
in 2021
Iran, Islamic Republic of rank
42nd
Malta rank
44th
Persistence to grade 5, male over time
- Iran, Islamic Republic of
- Malta
How they compare
Iran, Islamic Republic of currently reports 96.6% against 96.5% in Malta, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Malta ahead.
Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 42nd and Malta ranks 44th of 149 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Iran, Islamic Republic of averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iran, Islamic Republic of | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 91.3% | 97.9% | 6.6% | Malta |
| 2000s | 94.1% | 95.1% | 1.0% | Malta |
| 2010s | 96.1% | 95.4% | 0.6% | Iran, Islamic Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher persistence to grade 5, male, Iran, Islamic Republic of or Malta?
- Iran, Islamic Republic of, at 96.6% against 96.5% in Malta as of 2022.
- What is the difference in persistence to grade 5, male between Iran, Islamic Republic of and Malta?
- 0.1%, with Iran, Islamic Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iran, Islamic Republic of and Malta?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2014.
- How do Iran, Islamic Republic of and Malta rank globally for persistence to grade 5, male?
- Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 42nd and Malta ranks 44th of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Data API, UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), published as Persistence to grade 5, male (% of cohort). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Persistence to grade 5 (percentage of cohort reaching grade 5) is the share of children enrolled in the first grade of primary school who eventually reach grade 5. The estimate is based on the reconstructed cohort method.