IDA blend vs Lithuania: Persistence to last grade of primary, female
IDA blend
72.4%
in 2023
Lithuania
98.9%
in 2023
IDA blend rank
34th
Lithuania rank
33rd
Persistence to last grade of primary, female over time
- IDA blend
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 98.9% against 72.4% in IDA blend, a difference of 26.5%.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.4 times IDA blend's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.
IDA blend ranks 34th and Lithuania ranks 33rd of 45 groups.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IDA blend | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 79.4% | 99.2% | 19.8% | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 70.3% | 98.1% | 27.8% | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 70.4% | 97.9% | 27.4% | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 72.8% | 99.3% | 26.6% | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher persistence to last grade of primary, female, IDA blend or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 98.9% against 72.4% in IDA blend as of 2023.
- What is the difference in persistence to last grade of primary, female between IDA blend and Lithuania?
- 26.5%, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IDA blend and Lithuania?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2023.
- How do IDA blend and Lithuania rank globally for persistence to last grade of primary, female?
- IDA blend ranks 34th and Lithuania ranks 33rd of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Data API, UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), published as Persistence to last grade of primary, female (% of cohort). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Persistence to last grade of primary is the percentage of children enrolled in the first grade of primary school who eventually reach the last grade of primary education. The estimate is based on the reconstructed cohort method.