Finland vs Kazakhstan: Precentage enrolled in private institutions at the primary education
Finland
1.77
in 2024
Kazakhstan
1.63
in 2020
Finland rank
186th
Kazakhstan rank
189th
Precentage enrolled in private institutions at the primary education over time
- Finland
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Finland currently reports 1.77 against 1.63 in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.14.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 186th and Kazakhstan ranks 189th of 212 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.9543 | 0.1783 | 0.776 | Finland |
| 2000s | 1.26 | 0.6765 | 0.5877 | Finland |
| 2010s | 1.71 | 0.9092 | 0.7979 | Finland |
| 2020s | 1.99 | 1.63 | 0.3646 | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher precentage enrolled in private institutions at the primary education, Finland or Kazakhstan?
- Finland, at 1.77 against 1.63 in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in precentage enrolled in private institutions at the primary education between Finland and Kazakhstan?
- 0.14, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Kazakhstan?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2020.
- How do Finland and Kazakhstan rank globally for precentage enrolled in private institutions at the primary education?
- Finland ranks 186th and Kazakhstan ranks 189th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Precentage enrolled in private institutions at the primary education level, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Precentage enrolled in private institutions at the primary education level with 716 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.