Liechtenstein vs Moldova: Share enrolled in private institutions at the primary education level
Liechtenstein
3.0%
in 2021
Moldova
2.7%
in 2024
Liechtenstein rank
175th
Moldova rank
177th
Share enrolled in private institutions at the primary education level over time
- Liechtenstein
- Moldova
How they compare
Liechtenstein currently reports 3.0% against 2.7% in Moldova, a difference of 0.3%.
That makes Liechtenstein's figure about 1.1 times Moldova's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Liechtenstein has been ahead every year.
Liechtenstein ranks 175th and Moldova ranks 177th of 212 countries.
Liechtenstein has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Liechtenstein | Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.9% | 0.9% | 3.0% | Liechtenstein |
| 2010s | 3.6% | 1.3% | 2.4% | Liechtenstein |
| 2020s | 2.8% | 2.1% | 0.7% | Liechtenstein |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share enrolled in private institutions at the primary education level, Liechtenstein or Moldova?
- Liechtenstein, at 3.0% against 2.7% in Moldova as of 2021.
- What is the difference in share enrolled in private institutions at the primary education level between Liechtenstein and Moldova?
- 0.3%, with Liechtenstein ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Liechtenstein and Moldova?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2021.
- How do Liechtenstein and Moldova rank globally for share enrolled in private institutions at the primary education level?
- Liechtenstein ranks 175th and Moldova ranks 177th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Share enrolled in private institutions at the primary education level. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Private primary institutions are managed by private entities, such as NGOs, religious groups, or businesses, rather than public authorities, regardless of profit motive.