Hong Kong, China vs Timor-Leste: Primary completion rate, male
Primary completion rate, male over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Timor-Leste currently reports 93.2% against 92.6% in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Timor-Leste ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 102nd and Timor-Leste ranks 99th of 189 countries.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 96.4% | 90.4% | 6.0% | Hong Kong, China |
| 2010s | 101.9% | 89.6% | 12.2% | Hong Kong, China |
| 2020s | 110.7% | 91.2% | 19.5% | Hong Kong, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary completion rate, male, Hong Kong, China or Timor-Leste?
- Timor-Leste, at 93.2% against 92.6% in Hong Kong, China as of 2023.
- What is the difference in primary completion rate, male between Hong Kong, China and Timor-Leste?
- 0.6%, with Timor-Leste ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Timor-Leste?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Timor-Leste rank globally for primary completion rate, male?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 102nd and Timor-Leste ranks 99th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Data API, UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), published as Primary completion rate, male (% of relevant age group). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Primary completion rate, or gross intake ratio to the last grade of primary education, is the number of new entrants (enrollments minus repeaters) in the last grade of primary education, regardless of age, divided by the population at the entrance age for the last grade of primary education. Data limitations preclude adjusting for students who drop out during the final year of primary education.