Latvia vs United Arab Emirates: Primary completion rate, male
Primary completion rate, male over time
- Latvia
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 97.8% against 97.4% in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2001 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.
Latvia ranks 60th and United Arab Emirates ranks 63rd of 189 countries.
United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 102.4% | 105.4% | 3.0% | United Arab Emirates |
| 2010s | 97.8% | 102.5% | 4.7% | United Arab Emirates |
| 2020s | 97.9% | 99.4% | 1.5% | United Arab Emirates |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary completion rate, male, Latvia or United Arab Emirates?
- Latvia, at 97.8% against 97.4% in United Arab Emirates as of 2024.
- What is the difference in primary completion rate, male between Latvia and United Arab Emirates?
- 0.4%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and United Arab Emirates?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and United Arab Emirates rank globally for primary completion rate, male?
- Latvia ranks 60th and United Arab Emirates ranks 63rd of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Data API, UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), published as Primary completion rate, male (% of relevant age group). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Primary completion rate, or gross intake ratio to the last grade of primary education, is the number of new entrants (enrollments minus repeaters) in the last grade of primary education, regardless of age, divided by the population at the entrance age for the last grade of primary education. Data limitations preclude adjusting for students who drop out during the final year of primary education.