AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific vs Monaco: Proportion of qualified teachers in primary education, adjusted
AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific
1 GPIA
in 2024
Monaco
0.9267 GPIA
in 2024
AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific rank
91st
Monaco rank
91st
Proportion of qualified teachers in primary education, adjusted over time
- AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific
- Monaco
How they compare
AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific currently reports 1 GPIA against 0.9267 GPIA in Monaco, a difference of 0.0733 GPIA.
That makes AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific's figure about 1.1 times Monaco's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2020 it was Monaco ahead.
AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific ranks 91st and Monaco ranks 91st of 183 groups.
AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of qualified teachers in primary education, adjusted, AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific or Monaco?
- AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific, at 1 GPIA against 0.9267 GPIA in Monaco as of 2024.
- What is the difference in proportion of qualified teachers in primary education, adjusted between AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific and Monaco?
- 0.0733 GPIA, with AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific and Monaco?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2020 to 2024.
- How do AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific and Monaco rank globally for proportion of qualified teachers in primary education, adjusted?
- AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific ranks 91st and Monaco ranks 91st of 183 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Proportion of qualified teachers in primary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release