Monaco vs UNICEF: East Asia and Pacific: Proportion of qualified teachers in primary education, adjusted
Monaco
0.9267 GPIA
in 2024
UNICEF: East Asia and Pacific
1 GPIA
in 2024
Monaco rank
91st
UNICEF: East Asia and Pacific rank
94th
Proportion of qualified teachers in primary education, adjusted over time
- Monaco
- UNICEF: East Asia and Pacific
How they compare
UNICEF: East Asia and Pacific currently reports 1 GPIA against 0.9267 GPIA in Monaco, a difference of 0.0733 GPIA.
That makes UNICEF: East Asia and Pacific's figure about 1.1 times Monaco's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2020 it was Monaco ahead.
Monaco ranks 91st and UNICEF: East Asia and Pacific ranks 94th of 99 countries.
UNICEF: East Asia and Pacific has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of qualified teachers in primary education, adjusted, Monaco or UNICEF: East Asia and Pacific?
- UNICEF: East Asia and Pacific, at 1 GPIA against 0.9267 GPIA in Monaco as of 2024.
- What is the difference in proportion of qualified teachers in primary education, adjusted between Monaco and UNICEF: East Asia and Pacific?
- 0.0733 GPIA, with UNICEF: East Asia and Pacific ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Monaco and UNICEF: East Asia and Pacific?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2020 to 2024.
- How do Monaco and UNICEF: East Asia and Pacific rank globally for proportion of qualified teachers in primary education, adjusted?
- Monaco ranks 91st and UNICEF: East Asia and Pacific ranks 94th of 99 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Proportion of qualified teachers in primary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release