Monaco vs UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries: Proportion of qualified teachers in primary education, adjusted

Monaco
0.9267 GPIA
in 2024
UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries
1 GPIA
in 2024
Monaco rank
91st
UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries rank
89th

Proportion of qualified teachers in primary education, adjusted over time

  • Monaco
  • UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries
00.250.50.751201420192024

How they compare

UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries currently reports 1 GPIA against 0.9267 GPIA in Monaco, a difference of 0.0733 GPIA.

That makes UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries's figure about 1.1 times Monaco's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2020 it was Monaco ahead.

Monaco ranks 91st and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries ranks 89th of 99 countries.

UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher proportion of qualified teachers in primary education, adjusted, Monaco or UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries?
UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries, at 1 GPIA against 0.9267 GPIA in Monaco as of 2024.
What is the difference in proportion of qualified teachers in primary education, adjusted between Monaco and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries?
0.0733 GPIA, with UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Monaco and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries?
5 years are reported by both, from 2020 to 2024.
How do Monaco and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries rank globally for proportion of qualified teachers in primary education, adjusted?
Monaco ranks 91st and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries ranks 89th of 99 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Proportion of qualified teachers in primary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Monaco vs UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries: Proportion of qualified teachers in primary education, adjusted. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-qualified-teachers-in-primary-education-adjusted-gender-parity-index-gpia/monaco/unicef-east-asia-and-the-pacific-programme-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-qualified-teachers-in-primary-education-adjusted-gender-parity-index-gpia/monaco/unicef-east-asia-and-the-pacific-programme-countries/">Monaco vs UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries: Proportion of qualified teachers in primary education, adjusted</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Proportion of qualified teachers in primary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)
Unit
GPIA
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
282 places, 3,116 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release