Belarus vs UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries: Proportion of qualified teachers in upper secondary education

Belarus
1 GPIA
in 2024
UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries
1.03 GPIA
in 2024
Belarus rank
22nd
UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries rank
25th

Proportion of qualified teachers in upper secondary education over time

  • Belarus
  • UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries
00.250.50.751201420192024

How they compare

UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries currently reports 1.03 GPIA against 1 GPIA in Belarus, a difference of 0.03 GPIA.

Across all 11 years both countries report, UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 22nd and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries ranks 25th of 55 countries.

UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries Difference Ahead
2010s 0.9998 GPIA 1.05 GPIA 0.0492 GPIA UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries
2020s 1 GPIA 1.03 GPIA 0.0257 GPIA UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher proportion of qualified teachers in upper secondary education, Belarus or UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries?
UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries, at 1.03 GPIA against 1 GPIA in Belarus as of 2024.
What is the difference in proportion of qualified teachers in upper secondary education between Belarus and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries?
0.03 GPIA, with UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries?
11 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2024.
How do Belarus and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries rank globally for proportion of qualified teachers in upper secondary education?
Belarus ranks 22nd and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries ranks 25th of 55 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Proportion of qualified teachers in upper secondary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries: Proportion of qualified teachers in upper secondary education. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-qualified-teachers-in-upper-secondary-education-adjusted-gender-parity/belarus/unicef-east-asia-and-the-pacific-programme-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-qualified-teachers-in-upper-secondary-education-adjusted-gender-parity/belarus/unicef-east-asia-and-the-pacific-programme-countries/">Belarus vs UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries: Proportion of qualified teachers in upper secondary education</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Proportion of qualified teachers in upper secondary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)
Unit
GPIA
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
178 places, 1,605 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release