Hong Kong, China vs Latvia: Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education

Hong Kong, China
0.9295 NPIA
in 2022
Latvia
0.9544 NPIA
in 2022
Hong Kong, China rank
12th
Latvia rank
10th

Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Latvia
00.250.50.751200020112022

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 0.9544 NPIA against 0.9295 NPIA in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.0249 NPIA.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 12th and Latvia ranks 10th of 49 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Latvia Difference Ahead
2000s 0.9917 NPIA 0.9441 NPIA 0.0476 NPIA Hong Kong, China
2010s 0.9916 NPIA 0.9337 NPIA 0.0578 NPIA Hong Kong, China
2020s 0.9295 NPIA 0.9544 NPIA 0.0248 NPIA Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education, Hong Kong, China or Latvia?
Latvia, at 0.9544 NPIA against 0.9295 NPIA in Hong Kong, China as of 2022.
What is the difference in proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education between Hong Kong, China and Latvia?
0.0249 NPIA, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Latvia?
8 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
How do Hong Kong, China and Latvia rank globally for proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education?
Hong Kong, China ranks 12th and Latvia ranks 10th of 49 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, adjusted native parity index (NPIA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Latvia: Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-students-at-the-end-of-lower-secondary-education-achieving-at-least-a-51/hong-kong-sar-china/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-students-at-the-end-of-lower-secondary-education-achieving-at-least-a-51/hong-kong-sar-china/latvia/">Hong Kong, China vs Latvia: Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, adjusted native parity index (NPIA)
Unit
NPIA
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
49 places, 345 data points, 2000–2022
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release