How many years of comparable data are there for MDG: Developing Regions and Rwanda?

7 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in lower secondary education, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

MDG: Developing Regions vs Rwanda: Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in

MDG: Developing Regions

81.1%

in 2024

Rwanda

80.6%

in 2024

MDG: Developing Regions rank

58th

Rwanda rank

61st

Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in over time

MDG: Developing Regions
Rwanda

How they compare

MDG: Developing Regions currently reports 81.1% against 80.6% in Rwanda, a difference of 0.5%.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2017 it was MDG: Developing Regions ahead.

MDG: Developing Regions ranks 58th and Rwanda ranks 61st of 140 groups.

Across the 2 decades both report, MDG: Developing Regions averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	MDG: Developing Regions	Rwanda	Difference	Ahead
2010s	79.0%	68.5%	10.5%	MDG: Developing Regions
2020s	80.9%	85.7%	4.8%	Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in, MDG: Developing Regions or Rwanda?: MDG: Developing Regions, at 81.1% against 80.6% in Rwanda as of 2024.
What is the difference in proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in between MDG: Developing Regions and Rwanda?: 0.5%, with MDG: Developing Regions ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for MDG: Developing Regions and Rwanda?: 7 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2024.
How do MDG: Developing Regions and Rwanda rank globally for proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in?: MDG: Developing Regions ranks 58th and Rwanda ranks 61st of 140 groups.
Where does this data come from?: UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in lower secondary education, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

MDG: Developing Regions vs Rwanda: Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-teachers-with-the-minimum-required-qualifications-in-lower-secondary-6/mdg-developing-regions/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-teachers-with-the-minimum-required-qualifications-in-lower-secondary-6/mdg-developing-regions/rwanda/">MDG: Developing Regions vs Rwanda: Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in lower secondary education, female (%)
Unit: %
Source: UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence: CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage: 224 places, 2,763 data points, 1997–2025
Last refreshed: 16 August 2026

February 2026 Data Release