China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region vs Namibia: Proportion of total government spending on essential services

China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
15.7%
in 2024
Namibia
24.6%
in 2025
China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region rank
4th
Namibia rank
5th

Proportion of total government spending on essential services over time

  • China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
  • Namibia
0102030200020122025

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 24.6% against 15.7% in China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, a difference of 8.9%.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.6 times China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Namibia ahead.

China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region ranks 4th and Namibia ranks 5th of 20 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Namibia Difference Ahead
2000s 22.8% 22.3% 0.5% China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
2010s 19.0% 24.5% 5.5% Namibia
2020s 16.0% 25.0% 9.0% Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher proportion of total government spending on essential services, China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region or Namibia?
Namibia, at 24.6% against 15.7% in China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region as of 2025.
What is the difference in proportion of total government spending on essential services between China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and Namibia?
8.9%, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and Namibia?
19 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and Namibia rank globally for proportion of total government spending on essential services?
China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region ranks 4th and Namibia ranks 5th of 20 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of total government spending on essential services, education [UIS methodology] (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region vs Namibia: Proportion of total government spending on essential services. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-total-government-spending-on-essential-services-education-uis-methodology/china-hong-kong-special-administrative-region/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-total-government-spending-on-essential-services-education-uis-methodology/china-hong-kong-special-administrative-region/namibia/">China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region vs Namibia: Proportion of total government spending on essential services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Proportion of total government spending on essential services, education [UIS methodology] (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
216 places, 3,913 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed