Belarus vs UNICEF: Association of South East Asian Nations (asean): Pupil-qualified teacher ratio in lower secondary

Belarus
10.78 headcount basis
in 2024
UNICEF: Association of South East Asian Nations (asean)
24.4 headcount basis
in 2024
Belarus rank
57th
UNICEF: Association of South East Asian Nations (asean) rank
56th

Pupil-qualified teacher ratio in lower secondary over time

  • Belarus
  • UNICEF: Association of South East Asian Nations (asean)
10152025201420192024

How they compare

UNICEF: Association of South East Asian Nations (asean) currently reports 24.4 headcount basis against 10.78 headcount basis in Belarus, a difference of 13.62 headcount basis.

That makes UNICEF: Association of South East Asian Nations (asean)'s figure about 2.3 times Belarus's.

Across all 9 years both countries report, UNICEF: Association of South East Asian Nations (asean) has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 57th and UNICEF: Association of South East Asian Nations (asean) ranks 56th of 69 countries.

UNICEF: Association of South East Asian Nations (asean) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus UNICEF: Association of South East Asian Nations (asean) Difference Ahead
2010s 8.47 headcount basis 21.04 headcount basis 12.57 headcount basis UNICEF: Association of South East Asian Nations (asean)
2020s 10.15 headcount basis 23.25 headcount basis 13.09 headcount basis UNICEF: Association of South East Asian Nations (asean)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher pupil-qualified teacher ratio in lower secondary, Belarus or UNICEF: Association of South East Asian Nations (asean)?
UNICEF: Association of South East Asian Nations (asean), at 24.4 headcount basis against 10.78 headcount basis in Belarus as of 2024.
What is the difference in pupil-qualified teacher ratio in lower secondary between Belarus and UNICEF: Association of South East Asian Nations (asean)?
13.62 headcount basis, with UNICEF: Association of South East Asian Nations (asean) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and UNICEF: Association of South East Asian Nations (asean)?
9 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
How do Belarus and UNICEF: Association of South East Asian Nations (asean) rank globally for pupil-qualified teacher ratio in lower secondary?
Belarus ranks 57th and UNICEF: Association of South East Asian Nations (asean) ranks 56th of 69 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Pupil-qualified teacher ratio in lower secondary (headcount basis). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs UNICEF: Association of South East Asian Nations (asean): Pupil-qualified teacher ratio in lower secondary. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/pupil-qualified-teacher-ratio-in-lower-secondary-headcount-basis-2/belarus/unicef-association-of-south-east-asian-nations-asean/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/pupil-qualified-teacher-ratio-in-lower-secondary-headcount-basis-2/belarus/unicef-association-of-south-east-asian-nations-asean/">Belarus vs UNICEF: Association of South East Asian Nations (asean): Pupil-qualified teacher ratio in lower secondary</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Pupil-qualified teacher ratio in lower secondary (headcount basis)
Unit
headcount basis
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
228 places, 2,379 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release