Republic of Moldova vs UNICEF: Association of South East Asian Nations (asean): Pupil-qualified teacher ratio in lower secondary

Republic of Moldova
11.63 headcount basis
in 2024
UNICEF: Association of South East Asian Nations (asean)
24.4 headcount basis
in 2024
Republic of Moldova rank
54th
UNICEF: Association of South East Asian Nations (asean) rank
56th

Pupil-qualified teacher ratio in lower secondary over time

  • Republic of Moldova
  • UNICEF: Association of South East Asian Nations (asean)
0510152025201520192024

How they compare

UNICEF: Association of South East Asian Nations (asean) currently reports 24.4 headcount basis against 11.63 headcount basis in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 12.77 headcount basis.

That makes UNICEF: Association of South East Asian Nations (asean)'s figure about 2.1 times Republic of Moldova's.

Across all 9 years both countries report, UNICEF: Association of South East Asian Nations (asean) has been ahead every year.

Republic of Moldova ranks 54th and UNICEF: Association of South East Asian Nations (asean) ranks 56th of 69 countries.

UNICEF: Association of South East Asian Nations (asean) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Republic of Moldova UNICEF: Association of South East Asian Nations (asean) Difference Ahead
2010s 9.91 headcount basis 21.04 headcount basis 11.13 headcount basis UNICEF: Association of South East Asian Nations (asean)
2020s 11.14 headcount basis 23.25 headcount basis 12.1 headcount basis UNICEF: Association of South East Asian Nations (asean)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher pupil-qualified teacher ratio in lower secondary, Republic of Moldova or UNICEF: Association of South East Asian Nations (asean)?
UNICEF: Association of South East Asian Nations (asean), at 24.4 headcount basis against 11.63 headcount basis in Republic of Moldova as of 2024.
What is the difference in pupil-qualified teacher ratio in lower secondary between Republic of Moldova and UNICEF: Association of South East Asian Nations (asean)?
12.77 headcount basis, with UNICEF: Association of South East Asian Nations (asean) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and UNICEF: Association of South East Asian Nations (asean)?
9 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
How do Republic of Moldova and UNICEF: Association of South East Asian Nations (asean) rank globally for pupil-qualified teacher ratio in lower secondary?
Republic of Moldova ranks 54th and UNICEF: Association of South East Asian Nations (asean) ranks 56th of 69 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Pupil-qualified teacher ratio in lower secondary (headcount basis). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Republic of Moldova vs UNICEF: Association of South East Asian Nations (asean): Pupil-qualified teacher ratio in lower secondary. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/pupil-qualified-teacher-ratio-in-lower-secondary-headcount-basis-2/moldova/unicef-association-of-south-east-asian-nations-asean/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/pupil-qualified-teacher-ratio-in-lower-secondary-headcount-basis-2/moldova/unicef-association-of-south-east-asian-nations-asean/">Republic of Moldova vs UNICEF: Association of South East Asian Nations (asean): Pupil-qualified teacher ratio in lower secondary</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Pupil-qualified teacher ratio in lower secondary (headcount basis)
Unit
headcount basis
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
228 places, 2,379 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release