China vs UIS: Sub-saharan Africa: Pupil-qualified teacher ratio in upper secondary
China
15.3 headcount basis
in 2024
UIS: Sub-saharan Africa
27.39 headcount basis
in 2019
China rank
30th
UIS: Sub-saharan Africa rank
27th
Pupil-qualified teacher ratio in upper secondary over time
- China
- UIS: Sub-saharan Africa
How they compare
UIS: Sub-saharan Africa currently reports 27.39 headcount basis against 15.3 headcount basis in China, a difference of 12.09 headcount basis.
That makes UIS: Sub-saharan Africa's figure about 1.8 times China's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, UIS: Sub-saharan Africa has been ahead every year.
China ranks 30th and UIS: Sub-saharan Africa ranks 27th of 63 countries.
UIS: Sub-saharan Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pupil-qualified teacher ratio in upper secondary, China or UIS: Sub-saharan Africa?
- UIS: Sub-saharan Africa, at 27.39 headcount basis against 15.3 headcount basis in China as of 2019.
- What is the difference in pupil-qualified teacher ratio in upper secondary between China and UIS: Sub-saharan Africa?
- 12.09 headcount basis, with UIS: Sub-saharan Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and UIS: Sub-saharan Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do China and UIS: Sub-saharan Africa rank globally for pupil-qualified teacher ratio in upper secondary?
- China ranks 30th and UIS: Sub-saharan Africa ranks 27th of 63 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Pupil-qualified teacher ratio in upper secondary (headcount basis). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release