East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Mongolia: Pupil-teacher ratio, lower secondary

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
14.45
in 2018
Mongolia
21.09
in 2007
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
30th
Mongolia rank
32nd

Pupil-teacher ratio, lower secondary over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Mongolia
0510152025199420062018

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 21.09 against 14.45 in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 6.64.

That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.5 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Mongolia ahead.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 30th and Mongolia ranks 32nd of 43 groups.

Across the 2 decades both report, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Mongolia Difference Ahead
1990s 18.05 17.92 0.1325 East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
2000s 18.73 21.97 3.25 Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher pupil-teacher ratio, lower secondary, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Mongolia?
Mongolia, at 21.09 against 14.45 in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2007.
What is the difference in pupil-teacher ratio, lower secondary between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Mongolia?
6.64, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Mongolia?
13 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2007.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Mongolia rank globally for pupil-teacher ratio, lower secondary?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 30th and Mongolia ranks 32nd of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Stat Bulk Data Download Service, UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), published as Pupil-teacher ratio, lower secondary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Mongolia: Pupil-teacher ratio, lower secondary. Statizoid, drawing on Stat Bulk Data Download Service, UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/pupil-teacher-ratio-lower-secondary/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/pupil-teacher-ratio-lower-secondary/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/mongolia/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Mongolia: Pupil-teacher ratio, lower secondary</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Pupil-teacher ratio, lower secondary
Source
Stat Bulk Data Download Service, UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
180 places, 2,795 data points, 1981–2019
Last refreshed

Lower secondary school pupil-teacher ratio is the average number of pupils per teacher in lower secondary school.