Latvia vs Lebanon: Pupil-teacher ratio, lower secondary
Latvia
7.48
in 2017
Lebanon
7.4
in 2016
Latvia rank
127th
Lebanon rank
129th
Pupil-teacher ratio, lower secondary over time
- Latvia
- Lebanon
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 7.48 against 7.4 in Lebanon, a difference of 0.08.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 127th and Lebanon ranks 129th of 137 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Lebanon in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10.3 | 9.47 | 0.8228 | Latvia |
| 2000s | 10.21 | 10.37 | 0.164 | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 7.6 | 8.95 | 1.35 | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pupil-teacher ratio, lower secondary, Latvia or Lebanon?
- Latvia, at 7.48 against 7.4 in Lebanon as of 2017.
- What is the difference in pupil-teacher ratio, lower secondary between Latvia and Lebanon?
- 0.08, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Lebanon?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2016.
- How do Latvia and Lebanon rank globally for pupil-teacher ratio, lower secondary?
- Latvia ranks 127th and Lebanon ranks 129th of 137 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Stat Bulk Data Download Service, UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), published as Pupil-teacher ratio, lower secondary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Lower secondary school pupil-teacher ratio is the average number of pupils per teacher in lower secondary school.