Belarus vs ECA: North Africa (unsdcode:98103): Pupil-trained teacher ratio in lower secondary education

Belarus
10.94 headcount basis
in 2024
ECA: North Africa (unsdcode:98103)
25.38 headcount basis
in 2024
Belarus rank
72nd
ECA: North Africa (unsdcode:98103) rank
69th

Pupil-trained teacher ratio in lower secondary education over time

  • Belarus
  • ECA: North Africa (unsdcode:98103)
10152025201220182024

How they compare

ECA: North Africa (unsdcode:98103) currently reports 25.38 headcount basis against 10.94 headcount basis in Belarus, a difference of 14.44 headcount basis.

That makes ECA: North Africa (unsdcode:98103)'s figure about 2.3 times Belarus's.

Across all 12 years both countries report, ECA: North Africa (unsdcode:98103) has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 72nd and ECA: North Africa (unsdcode:98103) ranks 69th of 87 countries.

ECA: North Africa (unsdcode:98103) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus ECA: North Africa (unsdcode:98103) Difference Ahead
2010s 8.4 headcount basis 23.04 headcount basis 14.64 headcount basis ECA: North Africa (unsdcode:98103)
2020s 10.3 headcount basis 24.5 headcount basis 14.2 headcount basis ECA: North Africa (unsdcode:98103)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher pupil-trained teacher ratio in lower secondary education, Belarus or ECA: North Africa (unsdcode:98103)?
ECA: North Africa (unsdcode:98103), at 25.38 headcount basis against 10.94 headcount basis in Belarus as of 2024.
What is the difference in pupil-trained teacher ratio in lower secondary education between Belarus and ECA: North Africa (unsdcode:98103)?
14.44 headcount basis, with ECA: North Africa (unsdcode:98103) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and ECA: North Africa (unsdcode:98103)?
12 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2024.
How do Belarus and ECA: North Africa (unsdcode:98103) rank globally for pupil-trained teacher ratio in lower secondary education?
Belarus ranks 72nd and ECA: North Africa (unsdcode:98103) ranks 69th of 87 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Pupil-trained teacher ratio in lower secondary education (headcount basis). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs ECA: North Africa (unsdcode:98103): Pupil-trained teacher ratio in lower secondary education. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/pupil-trained-teacher-ratio-in-lower-secondary-education-headcount-basis-2/belarus/eca-north-africa-unsdcode-98103/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/pupil-trained-teacher-ratio-in-lower-secondary-education-headcount-basis-2/belarus/eca-north-africa-unsdcode-98103/">Belarus vs ECA: North Africa (unsdcode:98103): Pupil-trained teacher ratio in lower secondary education</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Pupil-trained teacher ratio in lower secondary education (headcount basis)
Unit
headcount basis
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
242 places, 3,005 data points, 1997–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release