Latvia vs SDG: Landlocked Developing Countries: Pupil-trained teacher ratio in lower secondary education

Latvia
8.32 headcount basis
in 2022
SDG: Landlocked Developing Countries
23.01 headcount basis
in 2024
Latvia rank
81st
SDG: Landlocked Developing Countries rank
84th

Pupil-trained teacher ratio in lower secondary education over time

  • Latvia
  • SDG: Landlocked Developing Countries
510152025201020172024

How they compare

SDG: Landlocked Developing Countries currently reports 23.01 headcount basis against 8.32 headcount basis in Latvia, a difference of 14.69 headcount basis.

That makes SDG: Landlocked Developing Countries's figure about 2.8 times Latvia's.

Across all 7 years both countries report, SDG: Landlocked Developing Countries has been ahead every year.

Latvia ranks 81st and SDG: Landlocked Developing Countries ranks 84th of 87 countries.

SDG: Landlocked Developing Countries has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia SDG: Landlocked Developing Countries Difference Ahead
2010s 7.6 headcount basis 22.88 headcount basis 15.28 headcount basis SDG: Landlocked Developing Countries
2020s 8.26 headcount basis 24.31 headcount basis 16.05 headcount basis SDG: Landlocked Developing Countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher pupil-trained teacher ratio in lower secondary education, Latvia or SDG: Landlocked Developing Countries?
SDG: Landlocked Developing Countries, at 23.01 headcount basis against 8.32 headcount basis in Latvia as of 2024.
What is the difference in pupil-trained teacher ratio in lower secondary education between Latvia and SDG: Landlocked Developing Countries?
14.69 headcount basis, with SDG: Landlocked Developing Countries ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and SDG: Landlocked Developing Countries?
7 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2022.
How do Latvia and SDG: Landlocked Developing Countries rank globally for pupil-trained teacher ratio in lower secondary education?
Latvia ranks 81st and SDG: Landlocked Developing Countries ranks 84th of 87 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Pupil-trained teacher ratio in lower secondary education (headcount basis). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs SDG: Landlocked Developing Countries: Pupil-trained teacher ratio in lower secondary education. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/pupil-trained-teacher-ratio-in-lower-secondary-education-headcount-basis-2/latvia/sdg-landlocked-developing-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/pupil-trained-teacher-ratio-in-lower-secondary-education-headcount-basis-2/latvia/sdg-landlocked-developing-countries/">Latvia vs SDG: Landlocked Developing Countries: Pupil-trained teacher ratio in lower secondary education</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Pupil-trained teacher ratio in lower secondary education (headcount basis)
Unit
headcount basis
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
242 places, 3,005 data points, 1997–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release