Hong Kong, China vs Latvia: Pupil-trained teacher ratio in primary education
Hong Kong, China
12.46 headcount basis
in 2024
Latvia
11.96 headcount basis
in 2022
Hong Kong, China rank
122nd
Latvia rank
125th
Pupil-trained teacher ratio in primary education over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Latvia
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 12.46 headcount basis against 11.96 headcount basis in Latvia, a difference of 0.5 headcount basis.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong, China ranks 122nd and Latvia ranks 125th of 139 countries.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 14.55 headcount basis | 11.35 headcount basis | 3.2 headcount basis | Hong Kong, China |
| 2020s | 13.03 headcount basis | 11.7 headcount basis | 1.34 headcount basis | Hong Kong, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pupil-trained teacher ratio in primary education, Hong Kong, China or Latvia?
- Hong Kong, China, at 12.46 headcount basis against 11.96 headcount basis in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in pupil-trained teacher ratio in primary education between Hong Kong, China and Latvia?
- 0.5 headcount basis, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Latvia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Latvia rank globally for pupil-trained teacher ratio in primary education?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 122nd and Latvia ranks 125th of 139 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Pupil-trained teacher ratio in primary education (headcount basis). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release