Monaco vs UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries: Pupil-trained teacher ratio in secondary education

Monaco
8.54 headcount basis
in 2024
UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries
20.72 headcount basis
in 2024
Monaco rank
100th
UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries rank
101st

Pupil-trained teacher ratio in secondary education over time

  • Monaco
  • UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries
05101520201320182024

How they compare

UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries currently reports 20.72 headcount basis against 8.54 headcount basis in Monaco, a difference of 12.18 headcount basis.

That makes UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries's figure about 2.4 times Monaco's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries has been ahead every year.

Monaco ranks 100th and UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries ranks 101st of 106 countries.

UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Monaco UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries Difference Ahead
2010s 9.74 headcount basis 18.25 headcount basis 8.51 headcount basis UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries
2020s 9.37 headcount basis 19.84 headcount basis 10.47 headcount basis UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher pupil-trained teacher ratio in secondary education, Monaco or UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries?
UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries, at 20.72 headcount basis against 8.54 headcount basis in Monaco as of 2024.
What is the difference in pupil-trained teacher ratio in secondary education between Monaco and UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries?
12.18 headcount basis, with UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Monaco and UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries?
6 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2024.
How do Monaco and UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries rank globally for pupil-trained teacher ratio in secondary education?
Monaco ranks 100th and UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries ranks 101st of 106 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Pupil-trained teacher ratio in secondary education (headcount basis). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Monaco vs UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries: Pupil-trained teacher ratio in secondary education. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/pupil-trained-teacher-ratio-in-secondary-education-headcount-basis-2/monaco/unicef-middle-east-and-north-africa-programme-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/pupil-trained-teacher-ratio-in-secondary-education-headcount-basis-2/monaco/unicef-middle-east-and-north-africa-programme-countries/">Monaco vs UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries: Pupil-trained teacher ratio in secondary education</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Pupil-trained teacher ratio in secondary education (headcount basis)
Unit
headcount basis
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
290 places, 3,858 data points, 1997–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release