Cecc-sica vs Croatia: Pupil-trained teacher ratio in upper secondary education
Cecc-sica
21.97 headcount basis
in 2015
Croatia
9.94 headcount basis
in 2003
Cecc-sica rank
57th
Croatia rank
59th
Pupil-trained teacher ratio in upper secondary education over time
- Cecc-sica
- Croatia
How they compare
Cecc-sica currently reports 21.97 headcount basis against 9.94 headcount basis in Croatia, a difference of 12.03 headcount basis.
That makes Cecc-sica's figure about 2.2 times Croatia's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Cecc-sica has been ahead every year.
Cecc-sica ranks 57th and Croatia ranks 59th of 150 groups.
Cecc-sica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cecc-sica | Croatia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 21.24 headcount basis | 11.24 headcount basis | 10 headcount basis | Cecc-sica |
| 2000s | 22.8 headcount basis | 10.14 headcount basis | 12.66 headcount basis | Cecc-sica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pupil-trained teacher ratio in upper secondary education, Cecc-sica or Croatia?
- Cecc-sica, at 21.97 headcount basis against 9.94 headcount basis in Croatia as of 2015.
- What is the difference in pupil-trained teacher ratio in upper secondary education between Cecc-sica and Croatia?
- 12.03 headcount basis, with Cecc-sica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cecc-sica and Croatia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2003.
- How do Cecc-sica and Croatia rank globally for pupil-trained teacher ratio in upper secondary education?
- Cecc-sica ranks 57th and Croatia ranks 59th of 150 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Pupil-trained teacher ratio in upper secondary education (headcount basis). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release