Cecc-sica vs Latvia: Pupil-trained teacher ratio in upper secondary education
Cecc-sica
21.97 headcount basis
in 2015
Latvia
11 headcount basis
in 2022
Cecc-sica rank
57th
Latvia rank
54th
Pupil-trained teacher ratio in upper secondary education over time
- Cecc-sica
- Latvia
How they compare
Cecc-sica currently reports 21.97 headcount basis against 11 headcount basis in Latvia, a difference of 10.97 headcount basis.
That makes Cecc-sica's figure about 2.0 times Latvia's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Cecc-sica has been ahead every year.
Cecc-sica ranks 57th and Latvia ranks 54th of 150 groups.
Cecc-sica has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pupil-trained teacher ratio in upper secondary education, Cecc-sica or Latvia?
- Cecc-sica, at 21.97 headcount basis against 11 headcount basis in Latvia as of 2015.
- What is the difference in pupil-trained teacher ratio in upper secondary education between Cecc-sica and Latvia?
- 10.97 headcount basis, with Cecc-sica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cecc-sica and Latvia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2015.
- How do Cecc-sica and Latvia rank globally for pupil-trained teacher ratio in upper secondary education?
- Cecc-sica ranks 57th and Latvia ranks 54th of 150 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Pupil-trained teacher ratio in upper secondary education (headcount basis). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release