ECA: Cen-sad (unsdcode:98112) vs Latvia: Pupil-trained teacher ratio in upper secondary education

ECA: Cen-sad (unsdcode:98112)
22.91 headcount basis
in 2023
Latvia
11 headcount basis
in 2022
ECA: Cen-sad (unsdcode:98112) rank
51st
Latvia rank
54th

Pupil-trained teacher ratio in upper secondary education over time

  • ECA: Cen-sad (unsdcode:98112)
  • Latvia
10152025200820152023

How they compare

ECA: Cen-sad (unsdcode:98112) currently reports 22.91 headcount basis against 11 headcount basis in Latvia, a difference of 11.91 headcount basis.

That makes ECA: Cen-sad (unsdcode:98112)'s figure about 2.1 times Latvia's.

Across all 13 years both countries report, ECA: Cen-sad (unsdcode:98112) has been ahead every year.

ECA: Cen-sad (unsdcode:98112) ranks 51st and Latvia ranks 54th of 150 groups.

ECA: Cen-sad (unsdcode:98112) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade ECA: Cen-sad (unsdcode:98112) Latvia Difference Ahead
2010s 21.89 headcount basis 9.14 headcount basis 12.76 headcount basis ECA: Cen-sad (unsdcode:98112)
2020s 21.56 headcount basis 10.42 headcount basis 11.13 headcount basis ECA: Cen-sad (unsdcode:98112)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher pupil-trained teacher ratio in upper secondary education, ECA: Cen-sad (unsdcode:98112) or Latvia?
ECA: Cen-sad (unsdcode:98112), at 22.91 headcount basis against 11 headcount basis in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in pupil-trained teacher ratio in upper secondary education between ECA: Cen-sad (unsdcode:98112) and Latvia?
11.91 headcount basis, with ECA: Cen-sad (unsdcode:98112) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for ECA: Cen-sad (unsdcode:98112) and Latvia?
13 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
How do ECA: Cen-sad (unsdcode:98112) and Latvia rank globally for pupil-trained teacher ratio in upper secondary education?
ECA: Cen-sad (unsdcode:98112) ranks 51st and Latvia ranks 54th of 150 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Pupil-trained teacher ratio in upper secondary education (headcount basis). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

ECA: Cen-sad (unsdcode:98112) vs Latvia: Pupil-trained teacher ratio in upper secondary education. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/pupil-trained-teacher-ratio-in-upper-secondary-education-headcount-basis-2/eca-cen-sad-unsdcode-98112/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/pupil-trained-teacher-ratio-in-upper-secondary-education-headcount-basis-2/eca-cen-sad-unsdcode-98112/latvia/">ECA: Cen-sad (unsdcode:98112) vs Latvia: Pupil-trained teacher ratio in upper secondary education</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Pupil-trained teacher ratio in upper secondary education (headcount basis)
Unit
headcount basis
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
227 places, 2,667 data points, 1998–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release