Latvia vs Macau, China: Pupil-trained teacher ratio in upper secondary education
Latvia
11 headcount basis
in 2022
Macau, China
10.53 headcount basis
in 2024
Latvia rank
54th
Macau, China rank
56th
Pupil-trained teacher ratio in upper secondary education over time
- Latvia
- Macau, China
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 11 headcount basis against 10.53 headcount basis in Macau, China, a difference of 0.47 headcount basis.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Macau, China ahead.
Latvia ranks 54th and Macau, China ranks 56th of 77 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Macau, China in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Macau, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 9.14 headcount basis | 14.31 headcount basis | 5.18 headcount basis | Macau, China |
| 2020s | 10.42 headcount basis | 9.72 headcount basis | 0.7034 headcount basis | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pupil-trained teacher ratio in upper secondary education, Latvia or Macau, China?
- Latvia, at 11 headcount basis against 10.53 headcount basis in Macau, China as of 2022.
- What is the difference in pupil-trained teacher ratio in upper secondary education between Latvia and Macau, China?
- 0.47 headcount basis, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Macau, China?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Latvia and Macau, China rank globally for pupil-trained teacher ratio in upper secondary education?
- Latvia ranks 54th and Macau, China ranks 56th of 77 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Pupil-trained teacher ratio in upper secondary education (headcount basis). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release