Latvia vs WB: Fy23 Ida & Ibrd Countries Classified As Fragile Situations: Pupil-trained teacher ratio in upper secondary education

Latvia
11 headcount basis
in 2022
WB: Fy23 Ida & Ibrd Countries Classified As Fragile Situations
22.2 headcount basis
in 2019
Latvia rank
54th
WB: Fy23 Ida & Ibrd Countries Classified As Fragile Situations rank
54th

Pupil-trained teacher ratio in upper secondary education over time

  • Latvia
  • WB: Fy23 Ida & Ibrd Countries Classified As Fragile Situations
10203040201020162022

How they compare

WB: Fy23 Ida & Ibrd Countries Classified As Fragile Situations currently reports 22.2 headcount basis against 11 headcount basis in Latvia, a difference of 11.2 headcount basis.

That makes WB: Fy23 Ida & Ibrd Countries Classified As Fragile Situations's figure about 2.0 times Latvia's.

Across all 9 years both countries report, WB: Fy23 Ida & Ibrd Countries Classified As Fragile Situations has been ahead every year.

Latvia ranks 54th and WB: Fy23 Ida & Ibrd Countries Classified As Fragile Situations ranks 54th of 77 countries.

WB: Fy23 Ida & Ibrd Countries Classified As Fragile Situations has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher pupil-trained teacher ratio in upper secondary education, Latvia or WB: Fy23 Ida & Ibrd Countries Classified As Fragile Situations?
WB: Fy23 Ida & Ibrd Countries Classified As Fragile Situations, at 22.2 headcount basis against 11 headcount basis in Latvia as of 2019.
What is the difference in pupil-trained teacher ratio in upper secondary education between Latvia and WB: Fy23 Ida & Ibrd Countries Classified As Fragile Situations?
11.2 headcount basis, with WB: Fy23 Ida & Ibrd Countries Classified As Fragile Situations ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and WB: Fy23 Ida & Ibrd Countries Classified As Fragile Situations?
9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
How do Latvia and WB: Fy23 Ida & Ibrd Countries Classified As Fragile Situations rank globally for pupil-trained teacher ratio in upper secondary education?
Latvia ranks 54th and WB: Fy23 Ida & Ibrd Countries Classified As Fragile Situations ranks 54th of 77 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Pupil-trained teacher ratio in upper secondary education (headcount basis). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs WB: Fy23 Ida & Ibrd Countries Classified As Fragile Situations: Pupil-trained teacher ratio in upper secondary education. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/pupil-trained-teacher-ratio-in-upper-secondary-education-headcount-basis-2/latvia/wb-fy23-ida-and-ibrd-countries-classified-as-fragile-situations/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/pupil-trained-teacher-ratio-in-upper-secondary-education-headcount-basis-2/latvia/wb-fy23-ida-and-ibrd-countries-classified-as-fragile-situations/">Latvia vs WB: Fy23 Ida & Ibrd Countries Classified As Fragile Situations: Pupil-trained teacher ratio in upper secondary education</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Pupil-trained teacher ratio in upper secondary education (headcount basis)
Unit
headcount basis
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
227 places, 2,667 data points, 1998–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release