Cuba vs Sao Tome and Principe: Repeaters in primary education, all grades, female (number), gaps
Repeaters in primary education, all grades, female (number), gaps over time
- Cuba
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 1,792 against 1,489 in Cuba, a difference of 303.
That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.2 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 110th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 108th of 199 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and Sao Tome and Principe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4,976 | 3,318 | 1,658 | Cuba |
| 2000s | 2,031 | 3,429 | 1,397 | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2010s | 1,234 | 1,827 | 592.81 | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher repeaters in primary education, all grades, female (number), gaps, Cuba or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 1,792 against 1,489 in Cuba as of 2017.
- What is the difference in repeaters in primary education, all grades, female (number), gaps between Cuba and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 303, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2017.
- How do Cuba and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for repeaters in primary education, all grades, female (number), gaps?
- Cuba ranks 110th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 108th of 199 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Repeaters in primary education, all grades, female (number), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Repeaters in primary education, all grades, female (number) with 705 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.