Timor-Leste vs UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries: Repeaters in primary education, all grades, female (number), gaps

Timor-Leste
57
in 2023
UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries
185,732
in 2022
Timor-Leste rank
155th
UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries rank
155th

Repeaters in primary education, all grades, female (number), gaps over time

  • Timor-Leste
  • UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries
01.0M2.0M3.0M199520092023

How they compare

UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries currently reports 185,732 against 57 in Timor-Leste, a difference of 185,675.

That makes UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries's figure about 3,258.5 times Timor-Leste's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries has been ahead every year.

Timor-Leste ranks 155th and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries ranks 155th of 199 countries.

UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Timor-Leste UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries Difference Ahead
2000s 14,535 876,391 861,856 UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries
2010s 15,786 552,555 536,768 UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries
2020s 7,008 216,172 209,165 UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher repeaters in primary education, all grades, female (number), gaps, Timor-Leste or UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries?
UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries, at 185,732 against 57 in Timor-Leste as of 2022.
What is the difference in repeaters in primary education, all grades, female (number), gaps between Timor-Leste and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries?
185,675, with UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Timor-Leste and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries?
15 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
How do Timor-Leste and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries rank globally for repeaters in primary education, all grades, female (number), gaps?
Timor-Leste ranks 155th and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries ranks 155th of 199 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Repeaters in primary education, all grades, female (number), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Timor-Leste vs UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries: Repeaters in primary education, all grades, female (number), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/repeaters-in-primary-education-all-grades-female-number-gaps-filled/timor-leste/unicef-east-asia-and-the-pacific-programme-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/repeaters-in-primary-education-all-grades-female-number-gaps-filled/timor-leste/unicef-east-asia-and-the-pacific-programme-countries/">Timor-Leste vs UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries: Repeaters in primary education, all grades, female (number), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Repeaters in primary education, all grades, female (number), gaps filled
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
419 places, 16,340 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

Repeaters in primary education, all grades, female (number) with 705 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.