Kazakhstan vs Libya: School life expectancy, tertiary, both sexes
School life expectancy, tertiary, both sexes over time
- Kazakhstan
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports 3.02 years against 2.97 years in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.05 years.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 50th and Libya ranks 48th of 183 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 2 and Libya in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 1.7 years | 0.3735 years | 1.32 years | Kazakhstan |
| 1990s | 1.71 years | 1.31 years | 0.4054 years | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 1.6 years | 2.42 years | 0.8201 years | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher school life expectancy, tertiary, both sexes, Kazakhstan or Libya?
- Libya, at 3.02 years against 2.97 years in Kazakhstan as of 2003.
- What is the difference in school life expectancy, tertiary, both sexes between Kazakhstan and Libya?
- 0.05 years, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Libya?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2000.
- How do Kazakhstan and Libya rank globally for school life expectancy, tertiary, both sexes?
- Kazakhstan ranks 50th and Libya ranks 48th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as School life expectancy, tertiary, both sexes (years). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Number of years a person of school entrance age can expect to spend within the specified level of education. For a child of a certain age a, the school life expectancy is calculated as the sum of the age specific enrolment rates for the levels of education specified. The part of the enrolment that is not distributed by age is divided by the school-age population for the level of education they are enrolled in, and multiplied by the duration of that level of education. The result is then added to the sum of the age-specific enrolment rates. A relatively high SLE indicates greater probability for children to spend more years in education and higher overall retention within the education system. It must be noted that the expected number of years does not necessarily coincide with the expected number of grades of education completed, because of repetition. Since school life expectancy is an average based on participation in different levels of education, the expected number of years of schooling may be pulled down by the magnitude of children who never go to school. Those children who are in school may benefit from many more years of education than the average.